I didn't have time to stay for the whole session, but here's the notes for what I said in my 3 minutes:
- Agencies must work together: BTD, BRA, MBTA, etc
- Transportation policy and land use are inseparable, is anyone from the BRA or city planning here? [no, it turns out]
- The T must work together with the city to eliminate minimum parking requirements particularly near MBTA stations
- Minimum parking requirements are a direct subsidy to automobile usage
- They create traffic congestion, hurt walkability through sprawl
- Every dollar of parking subsidy causes T ridership and revenue to drop
- If people don't pay true cost of driving, then the rest of us pay for it
- Turning to BTD, buses and trains carry more people than cars, but BTD treats buses as worth less than cars in road design.
- The T must work with BTD to change this attitude, get bus lanes and signal priority.
- For example, the Silver Line should have dedicated lanes all the way through Chinatown. It's not BRT if you don't do the important parts where it's "hard" to get done.
- Finally, improvements in service can save operational costs.
- Faster trip times mean fewer vehicles needed to operate the same service.
- The "front door only" policy on the Green Line must be ended
- It costs more money by slowing down trips than it saves in stopping fare evasion
- Sometimes trains easily sit for 5 minutes at a single station because of the bottleneck, people pushing in and out of the small front door
- It's not helping the T, it's just a form of collective punishment of the riders
- The T should treat customers as people, and have some pride in their work
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.